Here's a little note written in the mood to fly.
If there's one thing I said and shared with many readers through this blog is that greed, cynicism, lies, exploitation and isolation are the five pillars of board boxes / benefits and / or SSII. In short, it's a management style that has become commonplace among executives working conditions less than desirable (in view of the image that should be the engineer and / or bac +5). What was not my surprise to see a company like Ausy had been awarded the "innovative company" by the OSEO Anvar!
I do not know what area these people have to innovate, but this certainly labelisation discredits the organization has issued.
PS: For the curious, here's a link to find out who is OSEO (ANVAR is actually his former name). To summarize for those who have flem click it This is a public organization that helps innovative companies with your tax dollars. The question eminently political, then, is whether it is acceptable that the money be diverted from R & D to consulting firms?
Excerpt from link: " Support for Innovation (ex-Anvar) results in direct public support to innovation (subsidy or cash advance 0 rate payable in the event of partial or total success, coupled with specific support and educational project leaders in their approach) for future investments through innovation (Research and Development Partnership universities and laboratories ...) not be funded by banks (new market too risky, start-ups ...), and in compliance with EU rules on the use of state aid to SMEs in this context . This assistance may consider up to 50% of R & D deductions, according to the principle of sharing risk with the project leader (at the height of its equity) "
